|
robvk6 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
@AASteveo or you can do all your editing first on the track then clone it ...
Ringo2k7 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
simply do all your edits first =) @AASteveo
BMadd7 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
is the drums and the base from the pro tools?
J4wsome (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
this is good if you have only one input on your setup but if you really want a 'fat' guitar sound use multiple mics....pan them...eq...etc...
Mozaeous (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
There is little good in duplicating tracks. For some reason, it's just much too digital. 2 mono tracks of same guitar, different eq and compression plug-ins on each is much better. As in, shaping your bottom mids and low with one, and high mids and treble with the other. Thanks for bothering though...
blo0magic (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
@Geetarfrik yea. that seems to be overall good for most people's ear. The nice lows to the chords and crunchy highs. That makes a smooth feel to the guitar track.
Geetarfrik (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Or....... you could boost the lows and highs and leave the mids where theyre at, not scooping them. Thats what I do live to make stuff sound more full.
tongueboy500 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
@pablosalin i dont know what the resolution for the other DAWs are, PT 8 is 48 bit, reassuringly they have a white paper about it, if you are willing to accept some self promotion the paper is fairly informative, and is something that the other manufacturers should do as well.
scorchedsound (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
offsetting it a tad and adding a slight reverb to further change each track would add even more desirable thickness. Of course, actually physically playing another guitar track will always sound thicker.
xPaulHeinex (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
@ScorchinBeats y... it does |
